The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) proposed eliminating merchant surcharges on EFTPOS and credit cards as part of its 2025 review of merchant card payment costs. The RBA claims this move would simplify payments, increase transparency, and save consumers an estimated $1.2 billion annually. Businesses would also benefit from their proposed lower interchange fees. They then asked the public to comment on their proposal here. They received approximately 85 responses, and as expected, the reactions are mixed, mainly concerning costs and the likely business impact. What I have done here is review many of the responses and provide a summary of their views. The first point to note before I go into the details is that every one of them thinks the existing system is wrong and they want change. 

To understand the divide, let's start with consumer views, which primarily support the change.

Consumer Perspectives

Consumer advocates, such as Choice, broadly welcome the proposal. They view surcharges as unpredictable fees that add to everyday expenses in our cashless society. These fees feel like hidden costs. Advocates note that 85% of Australians prefer prices to include everything, rather than having to pay additional fees at checkout. Overall, they believe the public will save money.

Personal Insight

It annoys me too. Furthermore, despite our efforts, many clients don't activate Least Cost Routing (LCR) to cut merchant costs. Often, it's ignored, and many merchants assume that, since customers will cover the fees via surcharges, they do not need to worry about it. I disagree that your higher fees are costing you. Activate LCR now!

SMB Business Views

These express caution, fearing that the ban could force them to absorb the costs. They do not see the fee reduction as adequate. Those in low-margin sectors, such as retail, highlight risks to viability. For instance, if a business operates on a 4% margin and costs rise by 1% due to lost surcharges, that's a quarter of their profit erased. Some are predicting inflationary pressure. They tend to see the EFTPOS and credit card fees as high.

I consider this fear to be justified. Many merchants have no control over the prices. Without surcharges, many in the public will switch to premium cards with even higher fees that the merchant will have to pay. Consider this analogy: the cost of delivery does not disappear, even if someone claims a merchant cannot charge for it. The merchant will pay the price of the goods, or the price will go up. It will undoubtedly be inflationary.

Payment service operators (banks) tend to support some surcharge as they are concerned about squeezed margins. They now view debit and credit card fees as low. I liked the NAB response, which is worth a read.

Fin tech providers tend to prefer a surcharge-free electronic payment method, but they also accept that surcharges are necessary in today's market. Some see opportunities for alternatives, such as account-to-account payments, which some chemists are currently testing, as well as bitcoin.

Visa endorses the ban, as it will reduce consumer confusion, but doubts that the RBA's interchange fees are viable without cuts in services, such as fraud protection.

Industry Group Reactions

Retail and payment industry groups are emphasising potential unintended consequences. For example, the Australian Retailers Association argues that while surcharge removal simplifies operations, it will also obscure payment costs, making competition more challenging in margin-tight environments.

Groups like the Independent Payments Forum stress that the fees are the cause of the surcharges; the result will just be hiding these costs. They also dislike that larger organisations are charged significantly less in bank fees. Please review the graph provided below, which illustrates this point.

For many of our readers the ALNA submission will be relevant and well worth a read too.

Expert and Analyst Opinions

These are generally positive, e.g. Professor Steve Worthington describes himself as "delighted," noting it ensures "the price you see is the price you pay,". They point to the UK's experience with a surcharge ban, which led to a slight increase in inflation but improved transparency.

However, some caution that without robust enforcement, costs could shift to unregulated areas, such as Buy Now Pay Later services. I have my doubts about that. BNPL generally now has no customer surcharges but very high merchant fees.

Impacts of RBA Surcharge Removal

We have divided opinions here.

On a personal note, I would like to see the RBA examine the existing fees in detail to determine whether they are high or low.

What do you think of the RBA proposal?

Written by:

Bernard Zimmermann is the founding director of POS Solutions, a leading point-of-sale system company with 45 years of industry experience, now retired and seeking new opportunities. He consults with various organisations, from small businesses to large retailers and government institutions. Bernard is passionate about helping companies optimise their operations through innovative POS technology and enabling seamless customer experiences through effective software solutions.

The Reserve Bank of Australia's (RBA) ban on surcharges for debit and credit card payments, proposed to take effect on 1 July 2026, will, if accepted, significantly reshape the payment methods used in your store. This reform targets surcharging fees that retailers add to transactions paid for using Visa and Mastercard.

I am building on my article from yesterday, which sparked lively discussions. Let's explore the key issues you should consider.

Firstly, this proposal does not address the cause of why people charge these surcharges; the symptom of the surcharge is not the cause. Nor does it address the fact that SMB businesses pay significantly higher fees than larger organisations, often 350% more. The only point mentioned here that is relevant is the greater transparency in the costs. However, it's become quite transparent now. When I reviewed my EFTPOS and credit charges last time, I got, among other documents, a charge table showing the rates the bank would charge depending on my turnover and average transaction value.

If the proposal is accepted, likely fallouts include reduced cash transactions, increased credit card usage, continuing fee disparities between SMBs and large organisations, and some inflationary pressures.

Exploring the Key Fallouts if the Proposal Proceeds

Why Cash Might Fade Faster

13% of payments were made using cash in 2022, which is down from 70% in 2007, and that number is projected to fall to just 4% by 2030, according to Australian Banking Association.

Cash has long been popular for small, everyday purchases, such as a quick coffee or a newspaper at your local shop. Its appeal lies in the simplicity and lack of fees for both you and the customer. However, with surcharges banned, the cost barrier between cash and cards vanishes for consumers. Why would they dig for coins when tapping a card costs the same? This shift would further diminish the role of money, accelerating a trend already evident in Australia, which is what the Australian government aims to achieve.

Beyond diminishing cash use, we can expect to see a greater use of credit cards, as this ban would also equalise charges, leading to another key shift: many will ask, Why use debit when they can get credit for free?

Debating the Consumer Savings and Business Losses

The RBA estimates that Australian consumers could save nearly $1.2 billion annually if the proposal is implemented, equating to approximately $60 per card-using adult. This figure is debatable. Much of this money will shift elsewhere in the system, rather than disappear. That $1.2 billion represents a substantial loss to Australian businesses, particularly the large issuers of debit and credit cards, who stand to take significant revenue hits if the reforms proceed in their current form without changes.

Fee Hikes

Major banks will seek to recover losses from lowered interchange fees.

Running payment networks for Visa, Mastercard, and EFTPOS is enormously expensive. The cost of infrastructure, security, and global operations costs won't disappear under this plan.

Banks will need to pass these costs on somewhere. They might increase cardholder fees, such as annual charges or interest rates. But hiking merchant fees through administration charges is more likely.

Uncertainties Around Overseas Cards and Surcharging

It's unclear whether the plan will allow surcharges on overseas cards, such as American Express or a Visa issued in Singapore. I suspect that some form of surcharging will still be permitted for international transactions. It creates a pain point, as we will need to distinguish between domestic and foreign cards at checkout, which is long overdue. If this is done, we can adapt our POS systems to automatically detect card types, allowing us to handle surcharges without slowing down service.

Potential Inflationary Effects and Price Adjustments

Many businesses that currently apply surcharges are already considering price increases to compensate for the lost revenue. If you are among them, this approach makes sense to protect your margins, but it will contribute to slight inflationary pressures across the economy. If you are affected here, this will require careful handling to avoid alienating price-sensitive customers.

Turning Challenges into Opportunities with Practical Strategies

It's not all downside, as I stated yesterday, these changes will eliminate surcharge-related disputes, thereby fostering a better shopping experience. The reality is that customers hate surcharges.

With the timeline in 2026, you have time to prepare.

One idea worth considering is offering cash discounts after the ban is lifted. It remains an allowable option and can encourage customers to choose cash, thereby reducing your fee exposure. For example, one of my clients offers a free can of drink if the transaction is over $30 and is paid in cash. It worked well.

You need to consider how to adapt your payment strategy.

Written by:

Bernard Zimmermann is the founding director of POS Solutions, a leading point-of-sale system company with 45 years of industry experience, now retired and seeking new opportunities. He consults with various organisations, from small businesses to large retailers and government institutions. Bernard is passionate about helping companies optimise their operations through innovative POS technology and enabling seamless customer experiences through effective software solutions.

I got many questions about my article here

Here are the four questions I received, which generated considerable interest across the Australian retail sector. I explain why I believe this planned policy change will significantly impact how businesses price their products and process payments. I also explain why I think those who disagreed with me are wrong.

1) The Legislative Pathway for Surcharge Abolition

I agree that Labor's commitment to abolishing debit card surcharges will probably require legislation. Now, it was and is Labor policy to abolish these surcharges. Recent polls show strong public dissatisfaction with surcharges on card payments. When I spoke to a senior official in the NAB, I was told 71% of Australians polled. I cannot find any evidence to back this up, but it sounds reasonable to me. This creates significant political pressure for action.

Despite those who argue that the current law blocks a surcharge abolition, I believe a Legislative Pathway for surcharge abolition exists. Labor to put it through will need support from the Greens or the LNP to pass such an abolition through parliament. The LNP and the Greens are now re-evaluating their positions overall as they both lost their leaders in the last election. But before the election, the LNP had stated that surcharges were symptoms of deeper problems in the payment system. Meanwhile, the Greens advocated removing surcharges, with the banks absorbing these costs.

Despite differing policies, there is a cross-party recognition that the current surcharge system needs to be examined and reformed.

2) Potential Impact on Retail Pricing Models

Implementing a surcharge ban, which looks likely, will necessitate adjustments to retail pricing strategies. Most retailers will try to incorporate the cost of debit card processing into their base pricing structure. For example, if your debit card processing cost averages 1%, a product priced at $5.95 would need to be adjusted to approximately $6.01 to maintain margins. There is a marketing problem with making a price of $6.01.

Then there is a bigger problem: this price adjustment creates an unfair challenge for smaller retailers as they typically face higher processing fees than their larger competitors. A supermarket with a 0.5% debit fee will probably keep the magazine at $5.95, while a newsagent with a 1.2% fee would need to charge $6.02 for the same item. This pricing differential highlights the inequitable nature of card processing fee structures across the retail sector today. This assumes the magazine companies are okay with this. The most likely scenario here is that the newsagent loses 1.2%. I doubt any of the three political parties will care about this newsagent.

So, I suggest retailers consider reintroducing cash discounts, equivalent to card processing costs, for customers paying with cash. Our POS System can do that.

3) Understanding Current Surcharge Regulations

There continues to be significant confusion regarding what costs can legally be included in card surcharges under existing regulations. The current interpretation of legislation permits businesses to include only direct costs associated with EFTPOS processing in their surcharges.

This means costs such as:

) EFTPOS terminal rental fees

) Transaction fees charged by payment processors

) Receipt paper for EFTPOS terminals

However, indirect costs cannot be incorporated into surcharges, including:

) Your accounting services related to payment reconciliation, even if done by an outside contractor.

) Internet connectivity costs for payment processing

) Electricity costs for running terminals

The banks will analyse your surcharge rate for you. Our study has revealed that many financial institutions do not comprehensively outline all eligible direct costs when advising merchants on appropriate surcharge levels. This results in businesses underrecovering their actual costs. Check here for details.

4) POS Software Surcharge Considerations

Some retailers use Point-of-Sale (POS) systems that automatically apply surcharges to cover electronic payment costs. We think these surcharges only comply with current regulations if the additional charge is displayed on shelf pricing before the customer reaches the checkout. Few businesses that use such POS systems do that; if your company employs such a system, it is advisable to confirm with your POS provider that your surcharging practices align with current regulatory requirements. Non-compliant surcharging may expose your business to regulatory action from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). If you do ask them, please let me know their responses.

Conclusion and Next Steps

The proposed abolition of debit card surcharges represents a significant shift in Australia's retail payment landscape. While the exact timeline and implementation details await further political development, Labor is talking of early 2026

Suppose you have specific questions about how these changes might affect your retail operation or require assistance configuring your POS system to accommodate the new regulations. In that case, our team can provide tailored guidance and support. We remain committed to helping Australian retailers adapt to this evolving payment landscape.

Written by:

Bernard Zimmermann is the founding director at POS Solutions, a leading point-of-sale system company with 45 years of industry experience. He consults to various organisations, from small businesses to large retailers and government institutions. Bernard is passionate about helping companies optimise their operations through innovative POS technology and enabling seamless customer experiences through effective software solutions.

Although much of the election still needs to be sorted out, it is clear that now we need to consider the government's announced plan to ban debit card surcharges. It is set to take effect from January 2026. It is being presented as a measure to provide relief for consumers and a "fairer go". However, many of you do not see it this way. Many of you would feel that this will increase your costs, as we face it, it's the retailer that will now have to pay these debt charges. So, let's delve into what this change means, to consider the broader implications for your business.

We must speak here: Australia’s card payment system has, for a considerable time, been structured unfairly. Large national retailers, the supermarket giants and major department store chains, wield significant commercial power. This scale allows them to negotiate highly preferential, often rock-bottom, merchant service fee rates with the banks and international card schemes. Their sheer volume of transactions gives them leverage that an independent retailer cannot match. Currently, it's less of an issue than with cash; both independent and large organisations pay no fees to the bank on money. What makes it particularly bad is that in these government promises, there's no explicit, corresponding guarantee or mechanism announced to ensure that the bank charges the debt fees will be fair. This isn't anecdotal; this issue is acknowledged in reports from government regulatory bodies and industry analyses. On average, an SME business can expect to pay merchant fees for debit card transactions, sometimes two to three times more than what a major retailer pays for the same value and type of transaction.

To put this into perspective, a small business may see debit card fees ranging from 0.5% to 1.5%, and sometimes even more, particularly if newer or less typical card schemes are involved. Conversely, a large retailer might secure rates as low as a few cents flat per transaction, or a tiny fraction of a percent. For a $100 sale processed via a debit card, this disparity means a supermarket might incur a fee of just 20 or 30 cents. However, your local boutique, café, or specialty store could be charged $1.00, $1.50, or even more for that identical transaction. This difference isn't trivial.

Examining the Impact

Suppose the government proceeds with banning debit card surcharges without simultaneously legislating a significant and enforceable reduction in the underlying merchant fees that small businesses pay. In that case, the financial implications are pretty straightforward. The cost of accepting debit cards, which you can recover, will have to be absorbed directly by your business. For many independent retailers, this isn't a minor adjustment; it could translate into thousands, or even tens of thousands, of dollars in lost revenue annually, straight from your bottom line.

Let's consider the probable consequences under such a scenario. Prices are often set by suppliers in their RRP. I doubt that the suppliers will adjust their prices to these debit card increases. Then there is the problem of an item that says $4.95. You cannot increase it to $5.05, as inflation continues, you may be able to put the debt charges into the item, but certainly not immediately.

The other issue is that the surcharges explicitly show the consumer the bank fees; if this is hidden, as it will be in the government plan, what is to stop the banks from increasing it more? Debt fees now, compared to many countries, are high; what is to stop them from going up higher?

The Problem Lies with High Debt Fees

The fundamental challenge, which a ban on surcharging alone does not resolve, is the inherently unfair and often opaque structure of merchant service fees in Australia. Suppose the genuine policy objective is to create a more equitable financial environment for small retailers and deliver real savings. In that case, the primary focus must be on tackling these high debt fees. The proposal treats an effect rather than a cause. No one charges surcharges for cash, as it has no fees. The surcharge is there because of the debt charges.

A Call for Genuine Reform: What Should Change for True Fairness?

If the government is truly serious about fostering a fairer commercial environment, then the policy approach must be more robust. Simply shifting a visible cost (the surcharge) into an invisible, absorbed cost for the retailer doesn't solve the underlying problem of excessive debt fees.

We need a meaningful reform that ensures that banks and card schemes are compelled to offer more equitable and competitive rates to all businesses, regardless of their size. Any ban on surcharges, if it is to be fair, must be intrinsically linked with real, enforceable, and significant reductions in the cost of accepting card payments for all retailers. Without this linkage, the policy risks being perceived not as a measure of support, but as an additional financial impost on an already challenged sector, while letting the major banks and large retailers continue to operate with their existing advantages.

The coming months will be crucial as this policy develops. It is vital that small retailers' concerns are heard and acted upon to ensure a truly equitable outcome.

Written by:

Bernard Zimmermann is the founding director at POS Solutions, a leading point-of-sale system company with 45 years of industry experience. He consults to various organisations, from small businesses to large retailers and government institutions. Bernard is passionate about helping companies optimise their operations through innovative POS technology and enabling seamless customer experiences through effective software solutions.

I was watching Anthony Albanese's video here on excessive card surcharges. He argues that it is unfair that because one pays in cash, the coffee is $5; with a debit card, it is $5.10. He thinks this is unfair. His solution is to ban debit card surcharges.

To understand the full implications of this policy, we need to examine its effects on consumers and businesses on this clearly well-intentioned policy.

The Consumer Perspective

Let us start with a positive: removing debt surcharges will improve the shopping experience by eliminating unexpected costs at checkout, potentially increasing consumer satisfaction.

However, as card payments have become increasingly popular if the cost of both cash and card transactions must be the same, it would be $5.10. This means that cash users now pay more.

Cash transactions are cheaper because they are more profitable for the merchant. After all, they do not have bank fees. Why shouldn't a consumer benefit from that? As cash is now a good solution, it has nothing wrong; even with our advanced banking system, it's still the most cost-effective way of conducting business.

Banking System Effects

Banning consumer surcharges doesn't eliminate these debt costs. Someone will pay them, as they are not magically going to disappear.

With retail surcharges banned, they become hidden fees. Banks will see an opportunity to increase them. After all, if the public does not know of these fees, there's less pressure on banks to keep fees competitive. It would lead to even higher debt costs.

Business Implications

Due to their limited bargaining power, we see small businesses are charged higher merchant fees than larger companies. Banning surcharges would worsen this disparity, giving larger firms a competitive advantage and making it even harder for small businesses to compete.

A debit card fee isn't just a transaction between a business and a bank. It results from a complex network of banks, payment processors, and other financial institutions, and there is no simple solution.

Conclusion

If I have a crack in the wall, painting over it does not address the problem of what is causing it. Similarly, these debit card fees are not the cause of the problem but the result of their existence.

Cash now is a good solution.

Although the ideas behind banning debit card surcharges are commendable, the broader implications must be considered. Instead of a quick solution that may negatively impact small businesses and potentially raise prices for all consumers, we should pursue a comprehensive approach that addresses the underlying issues within our payment system.

Cost Shifting is not Cost Elimination!

The government has announced plans to ban debit card transaction fees, potentially starting January 1, 2026. This proposed ban, however, doesn't extend to credit card transactions.

A Global Trend in Payment Practices

In truth, this banning of debit surcharges was expected. Many countries, including the European Union and China, have implemented similar bans. Australia is now catching up with this global trend in consumer protection and payment fairness.

The Current Landscape: Widespread Surcharges

Today, many organisations, including government authorities, charge these fees. For instance, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) imposes surcharges on card payments. This practice is widespread across various sectors and affects consumers daily.

Consumer Frustration: The Hidden Costs of Convenience

Many consumers, myself included, are frustrated with the current situation. It's common to hear complaints. I know I am not the only one who doesn't like that a $7.50 coffee and doughnut is charged at $8.00. If I am told it's $7.50, I get a receipt for $7.50, and in the bank, I see $8.00.

This sentiment is extreme here when the surcharge seems disproportionate to the transaction amount. From my extensive research into bank systems, I can confidently say that the cost of processing a $7.50 debit transaction is nowhere near 50 cents. Taking money from one account and putting it into another cost the bank no more than a few cents.

Potential Impacts on the Retail Scene

The ban on debit card surcharges will likely have far-reaching effects on retail. Here are some potential economic points to consider:

Increased Consumer Spending

By removing a barrier to debit card use, we might see a slight increase in overall consumer spending. The absence of surcharges could encourage more frequent use of debit cards, potentially leading to more transactions.

Acceleration of Cashless Trend

Australia is rapidly becoming a cashless society, and this ban will accelerate this trend. What is keeping cash going is the lower fees to the consumer. If debit cards become even more cost-effective for consumers, they will use them more.

Potential Price Increases

Some businesses might have to increase their prices depending on how this is implemented. We already have too much inflation that refuses to go away, potentially exacerbating the issue.

Changes in the Banking Sector

Today, these fees play a significant role in banking pricing. If banks are not making money from these fees, what adjustments will they make to their business charges? This is a crucial question that needs addressing.

Retailers' Concerns: Questions That Need Answers

Here are some questions that I think retailers need to ask now while people are talking about these changes, If they miss this opportunity, what you will find is that the banks will talk, consumer groups, government and since retailers are not talking what will come out of it?

1. Costs: Who will pay for these costs if fees are eliminated? Retailers should be concerned about who will absorb these costs if surcharges are banned.

2. Fee discrepancies: There's a noticeable difference in processing fees charged to small businesses compared to large corporations. Why are small businesses often charged up to twice as much? The costs surely are not that much more!

3. Premium Card Fees: Retailers are often charged higher processing fees so the bank customers can get benefits like Qantas points. Is this justifiable?

4. Card-Specific Surcharges: Retailers cannot charge different surcharges for different types of cards. The ACCC is wrong to make it mandatory to charge the same fee for a standard Visa card and a premium Visa card.

5. Bank Fees: Why are our debit and credit card fees so much higher than those of many European countries and China? This deserves a thorough investigation.

6. Unfair fees: Unlike large retailers who can negotiate better rates with banks, small businesses often pay double the fees for card processing. Besides being unfair, it means that the effect of these costs will have more impact on them.

Moving Forward: The Need for Dialogue

As we approach the potential implementation date, consumers and businesses must stay informed about these changes. Retailer representatives should engage with the government to address their concerns.

Moreover, this presents an opportunity to review and potentially overhaul Australia's card payment system.

The Future of Payments in Australia

Today, about 12% of transactions are made using cash, down from 27% five years ago. We're rapidly moving towards a cashless society.

Conclusion: A Complex Issue Requiring Careful Consideration

In conclusion, while the proposed ban on debit card surcharges is generally positive for consumers, other stakeholders have legitimate concerns. The government must carefully balance consumer protection with the financial realities retailers face.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Are there any exceptions to the debit card surcharge ban for specific industries or transaction types?

A: As of now, I have heard no talk of any exceptions being announced. The government will likely provide more details as the policy is developed.

Q: What measures will be taken to ensure businesses don't increase prices to offset the loss of surcharge revenue?

A: I am guessing here, but I suspect the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) may monitor for unfair price increases.

Q: How will the ban impact digital wallet payments and mobile payment platforms?

A: I am wondering about this. Apple, for example, has a special fee. This is an overseas fee, so it's unclear whether it's covered here. So, we do not know whether this ban applies to all debit card transactions made through digital wallets and mobile platforms.

Q: How will this affect loyalty programs or cashback offers tied to card usage?

A: The ban may affect these programs. I am worried that if the banks face reduced revenue from merchant fees, they might move to a retailer-pay model.

Q: What support or resources will be available to help small businesses adapt to these changes?

A: The government hasn't announced specific support measures yet; retailer associations should investigate.

Q: How might this affect international transactions or tourists using foreign-issued cards in Australia?

A: Who knows? In this situation, the merchant may be charged the fee.

Q: How will this impact the competitiveness of different payment methods in the Australian market?

A: It makes debit cards more competitive compared to credit cards and probably cash.

Many details will need to be developed and implemented.

Are you tired of transaction fees nibbling away at your bottom line? No-cost EFTPOS promises a solution, but is it the right one? Before signing on the dotted line, let's explore what this model really means for your business.

Now, many of our customers are switching to No-Cost EFTPOS, partly because we have negotiated some really good deals for our clients and partly because many are tired of watching transaction fees eat away at their hard-earned profits. But often washing your hands of the problem is not the best move.

No-cost EFTPOS might seem like the answer to your prayers. But before you sign up, let's look at this payment model so you can make the best decision for your bottom line.

What is No-Cost EFTPOS, Really?

Think of it as a cost shuffle. In theory, it's marketed as that instead of you shouldering the fees that come with accepting card payments; your customers pay the small surcharge on each transaction. I would say the customer quickly knows the fees and does not care who charges them; they put the amount on you, and despite the hype, the customers do not care as it's so small; they do care.

The Upside: Real Benefits

• Say Goodbye to Hefty Fees:  No more upfront payments for your EFTPOS machine or those pesky monthly charges. This can be a massive relief for cash-strapped businesses.
• Flexible and Easy: Setup and calculations are a breeze.
• Pass on the burden and responsibility: The responsibility and some of the legal dangers for these fees are passed onto the EFTPOS provider!

Hold On, Not So Fast! Considerations to Keep in Mind

• Customer Experience: Be prepared to explain the surcharge clearly, especially on smaller purchases. Nobody likes surprises at the checkout.
• Limited Control: You might lose the ability to use fancy features like dynamic surcharging, where the fee changes based on card type. The odds are your EFTPOS fees will be higher.
• The Fine Print: Many fees you can claim are not included, e.g., setup charges and chargebacks.
• Lack of control: Currently, you control the fees; under No-Cost, you do not.

Is No-Cost EFTPOS Right for YOU?

Ask yourself these key questions:

• Transaction Volume: Do you take TONS of card payments each month? Lower volumes make No-Cost EFTPOS more attractive. 
• Price Control Cravings: Do you want to fine-tune how you charge customers? Traditional plans give you more options. A very successful marketing strategy is to offer all sales over $50 with no fees. Customers will often increase their basket size to get over this amount.
• Tech Tolerance: Are you ready to handle extra customer questions about the surcharge?

The Final Word: It's All About the Fit

No-cost EFTPOS is great for some businesses, but it's not a one-size-fits-all solution. Do your homework, talk to us, and compare your total costs with both models. That's the savvy way to find the system that lets you focus on what you do best—running your awesome small business!