I got many questions about my article here

Here are the four questions I received, which generated considerable interest across the Australian retail sector. I explain why I believe this planned policy change will significantly impact how businesses price their products and process payments. I also explain why I think those who disagreed with me are wrong.

1) The Legislative Pathway for Surcharge Abolition

I agree that Labor's commitment to abolishing debit card surcharges will probably require legislation. Now, it was and is Labor policy to abolish these surcharges. Recent polls show strong public dissatisfaction with surcharges on card payments. When I spoke to a senior official in the NAB, I was told 71% of Australians polled. I cannot find any evidence to back this up, but it sounds reasonable to me. This creates significant political pressure for action.

Despite those who argue that the current law blocks a surcharge abolition, I believe a Legislative Pathway for surcharge abolition exists. Labor to put it through will need support from the Greens or the LNP to pass such an abolition through parliament. The LNP and the Greens are now re-evaluating their positions overall as they both lost their leaders in the last election. But before the election, the LNP had stated that surcharges were symptoms of deeper problems in the payment system. Meanwhile, the Greens advocated removing surcharges, with the banks absorbing these costs.

Despite differing policies, there is a cross-party recognition that the current surcharge system needs to be examined and reformed.

2) Potential Impact on Retail Pricing Models

Implementing a surcharge ban, which looks likely, will necessitate adjustments to retail pricing strategies. Most retailers will try to incorporate the cost of debit card processing into their base pricing structure. For example, if your debit card processing cost averages 1%, a product priced at $5.95 would need to be adjusted to approximately $6.01 to maintain margins. There is a marketing problem with making a price of $6.01.

Then there is a bigger problem: this price adjustment creates an unfair challenge for smaller retailers as they typically face higher processing fees than their larger competitors. A supermarket with a 0.5% debit fee will probably keep the magazine at $5.95, while a newsagent with a 1.2% fee would need to charge $6.02 for the same item. This pricing differential highlights the inequitable nature of card processing fee structures across the retail sector today. This assumes the magazine companies are okay with this. The most likely scenario here is that the newsagent loses 1.2%. I doubt any of the three political parties will care about this newsagent.

So, I suggest retailers consider reintroducing cash discounts, equivalent to card processing costs, for customers paying with cash. Our POS System can do that.

3) Understanding Current Surcharge Regulations

There continues to be significant confusion regarding what costs can legally be included in card surcharges under existing regulations. The current interpretation of legislation permits businesses to include only direct costs associated with EFTPOS processing in their surcharges.

This means costs such as:

) EFTPOS terminal rental fees

) Transaction fees charged by payment processors

) Receipt paper for EFTPOS terminals

However, indirect costs cannot be incorporated into surcharges, including:

) Your accounting services related to payment reconciliation, even if done by an outside contractor.

) Internet connectivity costs for payment processing

) Electricity costs for running terminals

The banks will analyse your surcharge rate for you. Our study has revealed that many financial institutions do not comprehensively outline all eligible direct costs when advising merchants on appropriate surcharge levels. This results in businesses underrecovering their actual costs. Check here for details.

4) POS Software Surcharge Considerations

Some retailers use Point-of-Sale (POS) systems that automatically apply surcharges to cover electronic payment costs. We think these surcharges only comply with current regulations if the additional charge is displayed on shelf pricing before the customer reaches the checkout. Few businesses that use such POS systems do that; if your company employs such a system, it is advisable to confirm with your POS provider that your surcharging practices align with current regulatory requirements. Non-compliant surcharging may expose your business to regulatory action from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). If you do ask them, please let me know their responses.

Conclusion and Next Steps

The proposed abolition of debit card surcharges represents a significant shift in Australia's retail payment landscape. While the exact timeline and implementation details await further political development, Labor is talking of early 2026

Suppose you have specific questions about how these changes might affect your retail operation or require assistance configuring your POS system to accommodate the new regulations. In that case, our team can provide tailored guidance and support. We remain committed to helping Australian retailers adapt to this evolving payment landscape.

Written by:

Bernard Zimmermann is the founding director at POS Solutions, a leading point-of-sale system company with 45 years of industry experience. He consults to various organisations, from small businesses to large retailers and government institutions. Bernard is passionate about helping companies optimise their operations through innovative POS technology and enabling seamless customer experiences through effective software solutions.

Although much of the election still needs to be sorted out, it is clear that now we need to consider the government's announced plan to ban debit card surcharges. It is set to take effect from January 2026. It is being presented as a measure to provide relief for consumers and a "fairer go". However, many of you do not see it this way. Many of you would feel that this will increase your costs, as we face it, it's the retailer that will now have to pay these debt charges. So, let's delve into what this change means, to consider the broader implications for your business.

We must speak here: Australia’s card payment system has, for a considerable time, been structured unfairly. Large national retailers, the supermarket giants and major department store chains, wield significant commercial power. This scale allows them to negotiate highly preferential, often rock-bottom, merchant service fee rates with the banks and international card schemes. Their sheer volume of transactions gives them leverage that an independent retailer cannot match. Currently, it's less of an issue than with cash; both independent and large organisations pay no fees to the bank on money. What makes it particularly bad is that in these government promises, there's no explicit, corresponding guarantee or mechanism announced to ensure that the bank charges the debt fees will be fair. This isn't anecdotal; this issue is acknowledged in reports from government regulatory bodies and industry analyses. On average, an SME business can expect to pay merchant fees for debit card transactions, sometimes two to three times more than what a major retailer pays for the same value and type of transaction.

To put this into perspective, a small business may see debit card fees ranging from 0.5% to 1.5%, and sometimes even more, particularly if newer or less typical card schemes are involved. Conversely, a large retailer might secure rates as low as a few cents flat per transaction, or a tiny fraction of a percent. For a $100 sale processed via a debit card, this disparity means a supermarket might incur a fee of just 20 or 30 cents. However, your local boutique, café, or specialty store could be charged $1.00, $1.50, or even more for that identical transaction. This difference isn't trivial.

Examining the Impact

Suppose the government proceeds with banning debit card surcharges without simultaneously legislating a significant and enforceable reduction in the underlying merchant fees that small businesses pay. In that case, the financial implications are pretty straightforward. The cost of accepting debit cards, which you can recover, will have to be absorbed directly by your business. For many independent retailers, this isn't a minor adjustment; it could translate into thousands, or even tens of thousands, of dollars in lost revenue annually, straight from your bottom line.

Let's consider the probable consequences under such a scenario. Prices are often set by suppliers in their RRP. I doubt that the suppliers will adjust their prices to these debit card increases. Then there is the problem of an item that says $4.95. You cannot increase it to $5.05, as inflation continues, you may be able to put the debt charges into the item, but certainly not immediately.

The other issue is that the surcharges explicitly show the consumer the bank fees; if this is hidden, as it will be in the government plan, what is to stop the banks from increasing it more? Debt fees now, compared to many countries, are high; what is to stop them from going up higher?

The Problem Lies with High Debt Fees

The fundamental challenge, which a ban on surcharging alone does not resolve, is the inherently unfair and often opaque structure of merchant service fees in Australia. Suppose the genuine policy objective is to create a more equitable financial environment for small retailers and deliver real savings. In that case, the primary focus must be on tackling these high debt fees. The proposal treats an effect rather than a cause. No one charges surcharges for cash, as it has no fees. The surcharge is there because of the debt charges.

A Call for Genuine Reform: What Should Change for True Fairness?

If the government is truly serious about fostering a fairer commercial environment, then the policy approach must be more robust. Simply shifting a visible cost (the surcharge) into an invisible, absorbed cost for the retailer doesn't solve the underlying problem of excessive debt fees.

We need a meaningful reform that ensures that banks and card schemes are compelled to offer more equitable and competitive rates to all businesses, regardless of their size. Any ban on surcharges, if it is to be fair, must be intrinsically linked with real, enforceable, and significant reductions in the cost of accepting card payments for all retailers. Without this linkage, the policy risks being perceived not as a measure of support, but as an additional financial impost on an already challenged sector, while letting the major banks and large retailers continue to operate with their existing advantages.

The coming months will be crucial as this policy develops. It is vital that small retailers' concerns are heard and acted upon to ensure a truly equitable outcome.

Written by:

Bernard Zimmermann is the founding director at POS Solutions, a leading point-of-sale system company with 45 years of industry experience. He consults to various organisations, from small businesses to large retailers and government institutions. Bernard is passionate about helping companies optimise their operations through innovative POS technology and enabling seamless customer experiences through effective software solutions.

I was watching Anthony Albanese's video here on excessive card surcharges. He argues that it is unfair that because one pays in cash, the coffee is $5; with a debit card, it is $5.10. He thinks this is unfair. His solution is to ban debit card surcharges.

To understand the full implications of this policy, we need to examine its effects on consumers and businesses on this clearly well-intentioned policy.

The Consumer Perspective

Let us start with a positive: removing debt surcharges will improve the shopping experience by eliminating unexpected costs at checkout, potentially increasing consumer satisfaction.

However, as card payments have become increasingly popular if the cost of both cash and card transactions must be the same, it would be $5.10. This means that cash users now pay more.

Cash transactions are cheaper because they are more profitable for the merchant. After all, they do not have bank fees. Why shouldn't a consumer benefit from that? As cash is now a good solution, it has nothing wrong; even with our advanced banking system, it's still the most cost-effective way of conducting business.

Banking System Effects

Banning consumer surcharges doesn't eliminate these debt costs. Someone will pay them, as they are not magically going to disappear.

With retail surcharges banned, they become hidden fees. Banks will see an opportunity to increase them. After all, if the public does not know of these fees, there's less pressure on banks to keep fees competitive. It would lead to even higher debt costs.

Business Implications

Due to their limited bargaining power, we see small businesses are charged higher merchant fees than larger companies. Banning surcharges would worsen this disparity, giving larger firms a competitive advantage and making it even harder for small businesses to compete.

A debit card fee isn't just a transaction between a business and a bank. It results from a complex network of banks, payment processors, and other financial institutions, and there is no simple solution.

Conclusion

If I have a crack in the wall, painting over it does not address the problem of what is causing it. Similarly, these debit card fees are not the cause of the problem but the result of their existence.

Cash now is a good solution.

Although the ideas behind banning debit card surcharges are commendable, the broader implications must be considered. Instead of a quick solution that may negatively impact small businesses and potentially raise prices for all consumers, we should pursue a comprehensive approach that addresses the underlying issues within our payment system.

Cost Shifting is not Cost Elimination!

The government has announced plans to ban debit card transaction fees, potentially starting January 1, 2026. This proposed ban, however, doesn't extend to credit card transactions.

A Global Trend in Payment Practices

In truth, this banning of debit surcharges was expected. Many countries, including the European Union and China, have implemented similar bans. Australia is now catching up with this global trend in consumer protection and payment fairness.

The Current Landscape: Widespread Surcharges

Today, many organisations, including government authorities, charge these fees. For instance, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) imposes surcharges on card payments. This practice is widespread across various sectors and affects consumers daily.

Consumer Frustration: The Hidden Costs of Convenience

Many consumers, myself included, are frustrated with the current situation. It's common to hear complaints. I know I am not the only one who doesn't like that a $7.50 coffee and doughnut is charged at $8.00. If I am told it's $7.50, I get a receipt for $7.50, and in the bank, I see $8.00.

This sentiment is extreme here when the surcharge seems disproportionate to the transaction amount. From my extensive research into bank systems, I can confidently say that the cost of processing a $7.50 debit transaction is nowhere near 50 cents. Taking money from one account and putting it into another cost the bank no more than a few cents.

Potential Impacts on the Retail Scene

The ban on debit card surcharges will likely have far-reaching effects on retail. Here are some potential economic points to consider:

Increased Consumer Spending

By removing a barrier to debit card use, we might see a slight increase in overall consumer spending. The absence of surcharges could encourage more frequent use of debit cards, potentially leading to more transactions.

Acceleration of Cashless Trend

Australia is rapidly becoming a cashless society, and this ban will accelerate this trend. What is keeping cash going is the lower fees to the consumer. If debit cards become even more cost-effective for consumers, they will use them more.

Potential Price Increases

Some businesses might have to increase their prices depending on how this is implemented. We already have too much inflation that refuses to go away, potentially exacerbating the issue.

Changes in the Banking Sector

Today, these fees play a significant role in banking pricing. If banks are not making money from these fees, what adjustments will they make to their business charges? This is a crucial question that needs addressing.

Retailers' Concerns: Questions That Need Answers

Here are some questions that I think retailers need to ask now while people are talking about these changes, If they miss this opportunity, what you will find is that the banks will talk, consumer groups, government and since retailers are not talking what will come out of it?

1. Costs: Who will pay for these costs if fees are eliminated? Retailers should be concerned about who will absorb these costs if surcharges are banned.

2. Fee discrepancies: There's a noticeable difference in processing fees charged to small businesses compared to large corporations. Why are small businesses often charged up to twice as much? The costs surely are not that much more!

3. Premium Card Fees: Retailers are often charged higher processing fees so the bank customers can get benefits like Qantas points. Is this justifiable?

4. Card-Specific Surcharges: Retailers cannot charge different surcharges for different types of cards. The ACCC is wrong to make it mandatory to charge the same fee for a standard Visa card and a premium Visa card.

5. Bank Fees: Why are our debit and credit card fees so much higher than those of many European countries and China? This deserves a thorough investigation.

6. Unfair fees: Unlike large retailers who can negotiate better rates with banks, small businesses often pay double the fees for card processing. Besides being unfair, it means that the effect of these costs will have more impact on them.

Moving Forward: The Need for Dialogue

As we approach the potential implementation date, consumers and businesses must stay informed about these changes. Retailer representatives should engage with the government to address their concerns.

Moreover, this presents an opportunity to review and potentially overhaul Australia's card payment system.

The Future of Payments in Australia

Today, about 12% of transactions are made using cash, down from 27% five years ago. We're rapidly moving towards a cashless society.

Conclusion: A Complex Issue Requiring Careful Consideration

In conclusion, while the proposed ban on debit card surcharges is generally positive for consumers, other stakeholders have legitimate concerns. The government must carefully balance consumer protection with the financial realities retailers face.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Are there any exceptions to the debit card surcharge ban for specific industries or transaction types?

A: As of now, I have heard no talk of any exceptions being announced. The government will likely provide more details as the policy is developed.

Q: What measures will be taken to ensure businesses don't increase prices to offset the loss of surcharge revenue?

A: I am guessing here, but I suspect the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) may monitor for unfair price increases.

Q: How will the ban impact digital wallet payments and mobile payment platforms?

A: I am wondering about this. Apple, for example, has a special fee. This is an overseas fee, so it's unclear whether it's covered here. So, we do not know whether this ban applies to all debit card transactions made through digital wallets and mobile platforms.

Q: How will this affect loyalty programs or cashback offers tied to card usage?

A: The ban may affect these programs. I am worried that if the banks face reduced revenue from merchant fees, they might move to a retailer-pay model.

Q: What support or resources will be available to help small businesses adapt to these changes?

A: The government hasn't announced specific support measures yet; retailer associations should investigate.

Q: How might this affect international transactions or tourists using foreign-issued cards in Australia?

A: Who knows? In this situation, the merchant may be charged the fee.

Q: How will this impact the competitiveness of different payment methods in the Australian market?

A: It makes debit cards more competitive compared to credit cards and probably cash.

Many details will need to be developed and implemented.

Are you tired of transaction fees nibbling away at your bottom line? No-cost EFTPOS promises a solution, but is it the right one? Before signing on the dotted line, let's explore what this model really means for your business.

Now, many of our customers are switching to No-Cost EFTPOS, partly because we have negotiated some really good deals for our clients and partly because many are tired of watching transaction fees eat away at their hard-earned profits. But often washing your hands of the problem is not the best move.

No-cost EFTPOS might seem like the answer to your prayers. But before you sign up, let's look at this payment model so you can make the best decision for your bottom line.

What is No-Cost EFTPOS, Really?

Think of it as a cost shuffle. In theory, it's marketed as that instead of you shouldering the fees that come with accepting card payments; your customers pay the small surcharge on each transaction. I would say the customer quickly knows the fees and does not care who charges them; they put the amount on you, and despite the hype, the customers do not care as it's so small; they do care.

The Upside: Real Benefits

• Say Goodbye to Hefty Fees:  No more upfront payments for your EFTPOS machine or those pesky monthly charges. This can be a massive relief for cash-strapped businesses.
• Flexible and Easy: Setup and calculations are a breeze.
• Pass on the burden and responsibility: The responsibility and some of the legal dangers for these fees are passed onto the EFTPOS provider!

Hold On, Not So Fast! Considerations to Keep in Mind

• Customer Experience: Be prepared to explain the surcharge clearly, especially on smaller purchases. Nobody likes surprises at the checkout.
• Limited Control: You might lose the ability to use fancy features like dynamic surcharging, where the fee changes based on card type. The odds are your EFTPOS fees will be higher.
• The Fine Print: Many fees you can claim are not included, e.g., setup charges and chargebacks.
• Lack of control: Currently, you control the fees; under No-Cost, you do not.

Is No-Cost EFTPOS Right for YOU?

Ask yourself these key questions:

• Transaction Volume: Do you take TONS of card payments each month? Lower volumes make No-Cost EFTPOS more attractive. 
• Price Control Cravings: Do you want to fine-tune how you charge customers? Traditional plans give you more options. A very successful marketing strategy is to offer all sales over $50 with no fees. Customers will often increase their basket size to get over this amount.
• Tech Tolerance: Are you ready to handle extra customer questions about the surcharge?

The Final Word: It's All About the Fit

No-cost EFTPOS is great for some businesses, but it's not a one-size-fits-all solution. Do your homework, talk to us, and compare your total costs with both models. That's the savvy way to find the system that lets you focus on what you do best—running your awesome small business!